nuclei rabbit nrf2 antibody (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)
Structured Review

Nuclei Rabbit Nrf2 Antibody, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1444 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/nuclei rabbit nrf2 antibody/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 99 stars, based on 1444 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Octyl itaconate enhances VSVΔ51 oncolytic virotherapy by multitarget inhibition of antiviral and inflammatory pathways"
Article Title: Octyl itaconate enhances VSVΔ51 oncolytic virotherapy by multitarget inhibition of antiviral and inflammatory pathways
Journal: Nature Communications
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48422-x
Figure Legend Snippet: a NRF2 protein levels in control and NRF2 knockout (KO) 786-O cells treated with 4-OI (75 μM) for 24 h using confocal microscopy. Blue: actin filaments, green: NRF2. Scale bars, 50 μm. b KEAP1 levels analyzed in 786-O cells treated with alkynated 4-OI (4-OI-alk) (125 μM) for 4 or 24 h with or without non-alkynated 4-OI (125 μM) by anti-KEAP1 immunoblotting. c Viral RNA content assessed by RNA sequencing in VSVΔ51-infected (MOI of 0.01) control and NRF2 KO 786-O cells with or without 4-OI (75 μM) pretreatment. d – f Immunoblot analysis in control and NRF2 KO cells pretreated with 4-OI (75 μM) before VSVΔ51 challenge (MOI of 0.01) ( d ). Fluorescence microscopy showing VSVΔ51-RFP spread and cellular layer integrity with Hoechst stain overlay (Scale bars, 300 μm) ( e ) and quantification of infected cells by flow cytometry at 17 h post-infection ( f ). g – j Quantification of virus-infected cells by flow cytometry in 786-O cells transiently KO for NRF2 ( g ) or KEAP1 ( j ). Immunoblot analysis in NRF2 KO ( h ) and KEAP1 KO cells ( i ) pretreated with 4-OI (75 μM) before VSVΔ51 challenge (MOI of 0.01). k 786-O cells incubated with L-NAC (1 mM) for 3 h before 4-OI challenge (75 μM) for 24 h, then infected with VSVΔ51-RFP (MOI of 0.01). Quantification of infected cells by flow cytometry at 17 h post-infection. Data are means ± SEM from two independent experiments in biological duplicates and triplicates in ( f ), and in biological triplicates and quadruplicates in ( g ). Two experiments in biological quadruplicates in ( j ) and ( k ). Images from one representative experiment in triplicates in ( a ) and ( e ). Data in ( b ) and ( d ) from one representative of three independent experiments. Data as means ± SEM from one experiment in biological triplicates in ( c ). Statistics indicate significance by one-way ANOVA for ( f , g , j , k ). Vertical stacks of bands are not derived from the same membrane in ( d , h , I ). Source data provided in the Source Data file.
Techniques Used: Control, Knock-Out, Confocal Microscopy, Western Blot, RNA Sequencing, Infection, Fluorescence, Microscopy, Staining, Flow Cytometry, Virus, Incubation, Derivative Assay, Membrane
Figure Legend Snippet: a – c 786-O cells pretreated with 4-OI (75 μM) for 24 h and infected with VSVΔ51 (MOI 0.01) for 17 h. RNA sequencing analysis emphasizing on antiviral genes (blue dots) in the volcano plot ( a ), differentially expressed interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) in the heat map ( b ), and top KEGG pathways affected by 4-OI during viral infection (one-sided hypergeometric test, Benjamini–Hochberg method was applied to adjust the p -value for multiple testing) ( c ). d , e 786-O cells pretreated with 4-OI (125 μM) for 24 h and infected with VSVΔ51-RFP (MOI 0.01) for 24 h. IFIT1 levels assessed by fluorescence microscopy ( d ), and Western blot performed on cell lysates for antiviral proteins ( e ). f 786-O cells pretreated with 4-OI (75 μM) for 24 h infected with wild-type VSV (wt VSV) or VSVΔ51 at MOI 0.01. Viral titers determined 24 h post-infection. g – i Control and NRF2 KO 786-O cells, as well as 786-O cells transiently KO for NRF2 or KEAP using CRISPR/Cas9, pretreated with 4-OI (75 μM) for 24 h and infected with VSVΔ51 (MOI 0.01) for 17 h. Immunoblots in ( g , h ). CXCL10 release measured by ELISA from supernatants in ( I ). j Control and NRF2 KO 786-O cells pretreated with 4-OI (75 μM) for 24 h and stimulated with the RIG-I agonist M8 (3.5 ng/mL) for 5 h. Western blot performed on cell lysates. Data are from one experiment performed in triplicate in ( a – c ). Images are from one experiment in ( d ). Data are from one representative experiment performed at least three times in ( e ). Data are depicted as means ± SEM from one experiment performed in triplicate in ( f ). Data are from one representative experiment out of three in ( g ), out of two in ( h ) and ( j ). Data are depicted as means ± SEM from two experiments performed in triplicate in ( I ). Statistics indicate significance by two-way ANOVA for ( f , I ). Vertical stacks of bands are not derived from the same membrane in ( e , g , h , j ). Source data provided as a Source Data file.
Techniques Used: Infection, RNA Sequencing, Fluorescence, Microscopy, Western Blot, Control, CRISPR, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Derivative Assay, Membrane
Figure Legend Snippet: a CiiiDER analysis to identify overrepresented transcription factor binding sites in 786-O cells treated or not with 4-OI (75 µM) prior VSVΔ51 (MOI 0.01 for 17 h). b , c Confocal microscopy of p65 nuclear translocation in 786-O cells treated or not with 4-OI following VSVΔ51 (Scale, 20 μm) ( b ); IL-6 levels measured by ELISA ( c ). d , e Data from Runtsch et al. . THP1 cells treated with 4-OI following IA-DTB, cell lysis, and LC-MS measurements of modified cysteines. f 786-O cells upon 4-OI-alk with or without 4-OI (both 125 µM). Immunoblotting of IKKβ, IKKγ, and IKK ε before and after biotin enrichment. g Illustration of 4-OI binding (green) to IKKβ at Cys179 (left) and 2D ligand-protein interactions (right). Lipophilicity protein surface: lipophilic (cyan), hydrophilic (violet), neutral (white), α-helices (cyan), β-sheets (yellow), loops (cyan). h Luciferase NF-kB promotor activity in control and NRF2 KO 786-O treated or not with 4-OI prior to control (pc) or IKKβ plasmid transfection. i Immunoblotting of IKKα/β, IκBα, and P65 phosphorylation in 786-O cells treated or not with 4-OI prior VSVΔ51. j , k IKKβ KO 786-O cells treated or not with 4-OI following VSVΔ51, immunoblotting ( j ) and flow ( k ) analyses. l Luciferase assay of NF-κB promotor activity in HEK293 cells stimulated or not with 4-OI prior to IKKβ wt or IKKβ C179A plasmid transfection. Data from one representative experiment in ( a ), two independent experiments in ( b ). Data are depicted as means ± SEM from two experiments in triplicates in ( c ), three independent experiments in ( d , e ). Data from one representative experiment out of three in ( f ). Data are depicted as means from one experiment in duplicates in ( h ). Data from one representative experiment performed twice in ( I , j ). Data are the means ± SEM from two experiments performed in quadruplicates in ( k ). Data are the means ± SEM from two experiments in triplicates in ( l ). Statistical significance by two-way ANOVA for ( c , l ) and one-way ANOVA for ( k ). Vertical stacks of bands are not derived from the same membrane in ( f , i , j ). Source data are provided in Source Data file.
Techniques Used: Binding Assay, Confocal Microscopy, Translocation Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Lysis, Liquid Chromatography with Mass Spectroscopy, Modification, Western Blot, Luciferase, Activity Assay, Control, Plasmid Preparation, Transfection, Phospho-proteomics, Derivative Assay, Membrane